home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In <johnc.9p64@bbs.xnet.com> johnc@bbs.xnet.com (John Crookshank) writes:
-
- >I've re-rendered the same animations to our Flyer that we originally rendered
- >(and still have) on the PAR. There is a VERY noticeable increase in quality
- >coming from the Flyer. No artifacts, no JPEG blocks, no little squigglies
- >around the edges of sharply-defined objects, NOTHING. PAR is still a good
- >value, considering that it costs about a third of a Flyer with one drive, but
- >the Flyer's output is mucho better.
- >
- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- > [ John Crookshank | MicroTech Solutions, Inc. ]
- > [ | Chicagoland`s Premier Toaster/Flyer Dealer ]
- > [ johnc@bbs.xnet.com | BBS:708-851-3929 Voice:708-851-3033 ]
- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- >
-
- Hi John,
- Is this comparison using the Conner 1.26GB on the PAR. If not, the images may
- be a better comparison to the Flyer but you are right for the most part.
-
- Just Wonderin'
-
- Scott P. Nigel
- "Compassion Without Precision Is Chaos!"
-
-
-
-